Argument Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words - 1

Argument - Essay ExampleThus, the issue of giveing the great(p) penalisation remains a highly controversial base across the world. In the US many states award death penalty to offenders who commit premeditated homicide while some others do not have capital penalization. Killing a human being intentionally is a heinous crime and offenders who commit premeditated homicide need to be punished with capital punishment to deter others from engaging in such criminal activities. Criminal justice system awards punishment to the criminals with a view to prevent the recurrence of crimes. The society considers that both criminal offender needs to be awarded a punishment appropriate to the crime he or she commits. Thus, the advocates of death penalty contend that when capital punishment is awarded to a person who commits murder, potential murderers go forth think twice before killing for fear of losing their own life (The Death penalization Arguments for and Against the Death Penalty 1). Evidence also points to an analysis by the criminologist Isaac Ehrlich, which shows that for each inmate who was executed, 7 lives were sp bed as other perpetrators become deterred from committing similar crimes (1). This source concedes to the fact that studies relating to deterrence are sometimes inconclusive but it attributes this to the rare use of death penalty and the delay in its execution (1). Thus, it can be construed that death penalty acts as a deterrent to crime, which is a practical justification for the award of capital punishment (2). Criminal justice system relies on the basic tenet that every crime deserves a proportionate punishment for meeting the objectives of natural justice. Therefore, it appears natural that the person who perpetrates a premeditated murder of another person should be punished with death so that the victim and his or her family receive justice. Thus, the principle evolves that criminal justice must consider the extent of harm caused by the cr iminal and award a punishment that is proportionate to the crime (Bidinotto 20). However, the opponents of capital punishment hold the view that punitive measures derive from the concept of vengeance and the vindictive notion of an gist for an eye (23). Refuting this theory, Bidinotto argues that justice does not rely on the notion of vengeance but, on the other hand, is based on retribution (23). He further contends that wake mercy to murderers amounts to negation of simple justice and will actually act as an encouragement for criminals as they can gain more from crimes than any costs they will have to bear (23). Thus, it becomes evident that a punishment proportionate to the crime is only moral and, therefore, the award of capital punishment to a murderer is justified. metric murder is a crime that destabilizes the society and, therefore, when such crimes occur the community has a responsibility to respond. The death penalty can be considered as a uniquely powerful response to such a crime due to its being a permanent solution that cannot be retracted or overturned (Gelernter 26). Thus, by awarding death penalty to criminals who commit the offence of premeditated homicide, society makes a proclamation that such crimes are suddenly evil and absolutely intolerable (26). Therefore, it will dissuade criminals from engaging in such crimes and reduce murders. Though the opponents of death penalty are